Source code

Revision control

Copy as Markdown

Other Tools

<!-- This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
- License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
- file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. -->
<html>
<head>
<title>xptcall Porting Guide</title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="white">
<h2><center>xptcall Porting Guide</center></h2>
<h3>Overview</h3>
<blockquote>
is a library that supports both invoking methods on arbitrary xpcom
objects and implementing classes whose objects can impersonate any xpcom
interface. It does this using platform specific assembly language code.
This code needs to be ported to all platforms that want to support xptcall
(and thus mozilla).
</blockquote>
<h3>The tree</h3>
<blockquote>
<pre>
<a href="http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/reflect/xptcall">mozilla/xpcom/reflect/xptcall</a>
+--<a href="http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/public">public</a> // exported headers
| \--<a href="http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md">md</a> // platform specific parts
| +--<a href="http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/md/test">test</a> // simple tests to get started
\--<a href="http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/reflect/xptcall/tests">tests</a> // full tests via api
</pre>
Porters are free to create subdirectories under the base <code>md</code>
directory for their given platforms and to integrate into the build system
as appropriate for their platform.
</blockquote>
<h3>Theory of operation</h3>
<blockquote>
There are really two pieces of functionality: <i>invoke</i> and
<i>stubs</i>...
<p>
The <b><i>invoke</i></b> functionality requires the implementation of
the following on each platform (from
<a
>xptcall/xptcall.h</a
>):
</p>
<pre>
XPTC_PUBLIC_API(nsresult)
NS_InvokeByIndex(nsISupports* that, uint32_t methodIndex,
uint32_t paramCount, nsXPTCVariant* params);
</pre
>
Calling code is expected to supply an array of
<code>nsXPTCVariant</code> structs. These are discriminated unions
describing the type and value of each parameter of the target function.
The platform specific code then builds a call frame and invokes the method
indicated by the index <code>methodIndex</code> on the xpcom interface
<code>that</code>.
<p>
Here are examples of this implementation for
<a
>Win32</a
>
and
<a
>Linux x86, NetBSD x86, and FreeBSD</a
>. Both of these implementations use the basic strategy of: figure out
how much stack space is needed for the params, make the space in a new
frame, copy the params to that space, invoke the method, cleanup and
return. C++ is used where appropriate, Assembly language is used where
necessary. Inline assembly language is used here, but it is equally
valid to use separate assembly language source files. Porters can decide
how best to do this for their platforms.
</p>
<p>
The <b><i>stubs</i></b> functionality is more complex. The goal here is
a class whose vtbl can look like the vtbl of any arbitrary xpcom
interface. Objects of this class can then be built to impersonate any
xpcom object. The base interface for this is (from
<a
>xptcall/xptcall.h</a
>):
</p>
<pre>
class nsXPTCStubBase : public nsISupports
{
public:
// Include generated vtbl stub declarations.
// These are virtual and *also* implemented by this class..
#include "xptcstubsdecl.inc"
// The following methods must be provided by inheritor of this class.
// return a refcounted pointer to the InterfaceInfo for this object
// NOTE: on some platforms this MUST not fail or we crash!
NS_IMETHOD GetInterfaceInfo(const nsXPTInterfaceInfo** info) = 0;
// call this method and return result
NS_IMETHOD CallMethod(uint16_t methodIndex,
const nsXPTMethodInfo* info,
nsXPTCMiniVariant* params) = 0;
};
</pre
>
Code that wishes to make use of this <i>stubs</i> functionality (such as
<a href="http://www.mozilla.org/scriptable/">XPConnect</a>) implement a
class which inherits from <code>nsXPTCStubBase</code> and implements the
<code>GetInterfaceInfo</code> and <code>CallMethod</code> to let the
platform specific code know how to get interface information and how to
dispatch methods once their parameters have been pulled out of the
platform specific calling frame.
<p>
Porters of this functionality implement the platform specific code for
the
<i>stub</i> methods that fill the vtbl for this class. The idea here is
that the class has a vtbl full of a large number of generic stubs. All
instances of this class share that vtbl and the same stubs. The stubs
forward calls to a platform specific method that uses the interface
information supplied by the overridden <code>GetInterfaceInfo</code> to
extract the parameters and build an array of platform independent
<code>nsXPTCMiniVariant</code> structs which are in turn passed on to
the overridden <code>CallMethod</code>. The platform dependent code is
responsible for doing any cleanup and returning.
</p>
<p>
The stub methods are declared in
<a
>xptcall/xptcstubsdecl.inc</a
>. These are '#included' into the declaration of
<code>nsXPTCStubBase</code>. A similar include file (<a
>xptcall/xptcstubsdef.inc</a
>) is expanded using platform specific macros to define the stub
functions. These '.inc' files are checked into cvs. However, they can be
regenerated as necessary (i.e. to change the number of stubs or to
change their specific declaration) using the Perl script
<a
>xptcall/genstubs.pl</a
>.
</p>
<p>
Here are examples of this implementation for
<a
>Win32</a
>
and
<a
>Linux x86, NetBSD x86, and FreeBSD</a
>. Both of these examples use inline assembly language. That is just how
I decided to do it. You can do it as you choose.
</p>
<p>
The Win32 version is somewhat tighter because the __declspec(naked)
feature allows for very small stubs. However, the __stdcall requires the
callee to clean up the stack, so it is imperative that the interface
information scheme allow the code to determine the correct stack pointer
fixup for return without fail, else the process will crash.
</p>
<p>
I opted to use inline assembler for the gcc Linux x86 port. I ended up
with larger stubs than I would have preferred rather than battle the
compiler over what would happen to the stack before my asm code began
running.
</p>
<p>
I believe that the non-assembly parts of these files can be copied and
reused with minimal (but not zero) platform specific tweaks. Feel free
to copy and paste as necessary. Please remember that safety and
reliability are more important than speed optimizations. This code is
primarily used to connect XPCOM components with JavaScript; function
call overhead is a <b>tiny</b> part of the time involved.
</p>
<p>
I put together
<a
>xptcall/md/test
</a>
as a place to evolve the basic functionality as a port is coming
together. Not all of the functionality is exercised, but it is a place
to get started.
<a
>xptcall/tests
</a>
has an api level test for <code>NS_InvokeByIndex</code>, but no tests
for the <i>stubs</i> functionality. Such a test ought to be written, but
this has not yet been done.
</p>
<p>
A full 'test' at this point requires building the client and running the
XPConnect test called <i>TestXPC</i> in
>mozilla/js/xpconnect/tests </a
>.
</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
<b>Author:</b>
<a href="mailto:jband@netscape.com"
>John Bandhauer &lt;jband@netscape.com&gt;</a
><br />
<b>Last modified:</b> 31 May 1999
</body>
</html>